ci: the runner is docker-mode, and a guide for setting one up
`runs-on: ubuntu-latest` stays what it is everywhere else — a disposable container — and `docker-compose.ci.yml` is now what makes that true: the label maps to `catthehacker/ubuntu:act-24.04`, job containers share the runner's network so the cache server is reachable at all, and the host's docker socket is passed through (`docker_host: automount`) so the image workflow can build. The failure this is replacing is worth naming, because the symptom does not point at it: with a **host**-mode runner answering the same label, every job runs directly on the server as the runner's own user, so the workflows' `apt-get install` steps fail on permissions — and had they succeeded, CI would have been installing packages on a host. A workflow cannot tell which kind of runner it got; only the label map can say. `docs/gitea-runner.md` is the separate guide: why docker mode, the prerequisites including Gitea's two `app.ini` settings, the install, how to remove a host-mode runner (and what to check before you do, since a runner is shared), how to verify a job really is in a container, why labels cannot be changed without re-registering, and a table of the failures with their causes. Also `workflow_dispatch` on the test workflow, so a fresh runner can be proved from the UI without inventing a commit. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
6 files changed
+299
-59
No files matched your search
@@ -13,6 +13,8 @@ on:
|
||||
push:
|
||||
branches: [master]
|
||||
pull_request:
|
||||
# So a new runner can be proved out from the UI without inventing a commit.
|
||||
workflow_dispatch:
|
||||
|
||||
env:
|
||||
DEBIAN_FRONTEND: noninteractive
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user